My
first reaction to reading Aladdin and the
Wonderful Lamp was, “that was weird.” It was not what I expected, but was
still an interesting read, especially with the additional reading of the
articles that provided some context to the story’s origin.
While
reading the story, I had a few questions come to mind, some of which were
answered later in the text. To start with, I was confused by why the Magician
needed the lamp in the first place, considering he had the genie from the ring.
This is explained later, when Aladdin asks the ring genie for something that he
is not powerful enough to do. Another question I had was about where the story
was written. It takes place in China (which was a surprise to me because everything
seemed Middle Eastern), and then has an evil magician from Africa, making me
think it was written in a place that might have negative attitudes towards Africa/Africans.
Upon reading the article by Mari Ness, it made more sense that the two places
were displayed in the ways they were. I thought it was weird that they
specified two different types of slaves based on race; white and black. It made
me curious as to what the view on race was back then and how black slaves were
viewed versus white ones.
I
also thought it was interesting that women and foreigners caused bad things to
happen, but Aladdin, who uses magic to achieve his goal of marrying the
princess, is not seen as the bad guy. The magician is African and takes the palace
to Africa, which portrays Africa in a bad light, and the princess is the one
who gives him the lamp, which somewhat shows her as careless. I would consider
what Aladdin did as wrong; he used magic to allow him to spend the night with
the princess, and then to get enough wealth to convince the Sultan to allow him
to marry her. These things do make sense when considering that this story is
about rebelling and going against the status quo. It’s interesting that magic
is used to do this though, conveying somewhat that going against the status quo
without external help is difficult.
I
like the message about changing status levels, but to be frank, I don’t like
how it is conveyed in this story. Aladdin is lazy and doesn’t want to work, yet
goes from rags to riches based on sheer luck. The story doesn’t encourage hard
work or being clever to change your status. This does however make some sense.
The piece wasn’t written in a modern time, and the idea of being able to elevate
oneself through hard work in a capitalistic system probably wasn’t a very
common one. In this case, the story would provide an entertaining message for people
who aren’t wealthy, and would allow them to dream of a life with more
extravagance. Overall it was cool to read a story that wasn’t a traditional
European one, although still kind of was because of how it was written and who
wrote it. Aladdin has a very interesting place in the history of fairy tales,
and upon reading one adaptation its unique elements stand out.
No comments:
Post a Comment